Thursday, March 28, 2013

Men who regularly use saunas have lower sperm counts

  • Men in their 30s with normal sperm counts were tested
  • Those who spent 15 minutes in a sauna twice a week for three months had lower counts than at the start
  • Heat is to blame, say the researchers, as saunas raise the temperature of the scrotum by 3C


  •  

    Men who visit saunas may be damaging their sperm, Italian researchers have warned. 
    They found that healthy men who regularly used them had a lower sperm count - and the damage could last several months.
    In the study, Finnish men in their 30s who had normal sperm counts were monitored.
    They all spent 15 minutes in a sauna twice a week for three months, after which their sperm counts were tested.
    Overheating: Men who regularly used had lower sperm counts, with the damage lasting several months
    Overheating: Men who regularly used had lower sperm counts, with the damage lasting several months
    The researchers discovered that the men's sperm counts were lower at the end of the study than at the beginning - and only six months later did they return to normal.
    Dr Andrew Kramer, a urologist at the University of Maryland Medical Centre told the website LiveScience that heat was to blame, as it affects sperm production.
     

    The researchers found that during the sauna sessions, the temperature of the men's scrotums increased by three degrees Celsius (5.4 F).
    'The testicles hang down from the body in men to cool them,' added Dr Kramer. He added this may be why 'men with undescended testicles can have impaired sperm product and fertility'.
    Men who used the saunas also had differences in their sperm's DNA, the researchers noted.
    Previous research has shown that heat from laptops can damage sperm, affecting fertility as it struggles to swim to the egg. 
    Reporting in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers in the sauna study said: 'The large use of Finnish sauna in Nordic countries and its growing use in other parts of the world make it important to consider the impact of this lifestyle choice on men's fertility.'
    Men who used the saunas also had differences in their sperm's DNA, the researchers noted
    Men who used the saunas also had differences in their sperm's DNA, the researchers noted
    They added that in countries were saunas are widely used, doctors should flag up the problems they may cause to couples struggling to conceive.  
    Sperm counts are falling at an alarming rate - up to 38 per cent in a decade - with diet and lifestyle largely to blame. 
    A recent Spanish study found that even in young men, sperm concentration fell by an average of two per cent a year - and could soon hit levels where fertility is compromised. 
    A ten year-study of more than 200 men found the average concentration went from 72 million spermatozoids per millilitre in 2001 to 52 million/ml in 2011.
    Meanwhile a British survey published last month found that nearly 20 per cent of couples spend more than a year trying for a baby.
    And the effect of not being able to conceive is so bad for some couples that it forces them apart - or places their relationship under great pressure. 
    Experts have blamed women delaying motherhood and the obesity epidemic as the two most likely reasons for rising infertility.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2299488/Saunas-damage-mens-sperm.html#ixzz2OtMMGNRp 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Breastfeeding for six months 'cuts the risk of dying from cancer by 10%'

  • Six months of breastfeeding your child cuts risk of dying from all cancers 
  • Women who breastfeed also 17 per cent less likely to die from a heart attack


  •  


    Safer: A woman who breastfeeds her child is 10 per cent less likely to die from any from of cancer
    Safer: A woman who breastfeeds her child is 10 per cent less likely to die from any from of cancer
    Women who breastfeed for six months reduce their risk of dying from all cancers by 10 per cent, researchers say.
    They also cut their chances of death from heart attacks and strokes by 17 per cent.
    And following all the main recommendations for a healthy life reduces the risk of dying from a range of diseases by a third, the study found.
    It looked at the contribution made to ill-health by poor lifestyles by examining how closely people complied with seven key recommendations to reduce cancer risk.
    Researchers studied nearly 380,000 people in nine European countries over 12 years. They found that those who followed the advice from the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) most closely cut their chances of dying from several diseases by 34 per cent.
    The recommendations are to maintain a healthy weight, be physically active, cut down on foods and drinks that help increase weight, eat more plant foods, reduce consumption of meat and alcoholic drinks, and – in the case of nursing mothers – breastfeed for at least six months.
    Dr Teresa Norat, of Imperial College London, who led the project, said: ‘This large European study is the first that shows there is a strong association between following the WCRF/AICR recommendations and a reduced risk of dying from cancer, circulatory diseases and respiratory diseases. Now further research is needed in other large populations to confirm these findings.’
    Those who most closely followed the WCRF/AICR recommendations cut their chances of dying from respiratory disease by 50 per cent, circulatory disease by 44 per cent and cancer by 20 per cent compared with those who the lowest level of compliance.
     

    The recommendations with the greatest impact on reducing the risk of death from disease were being as lean as possible without becoming underweight (22 per cent lower risk) and eating mostly plant foods (21 per cent).
    Limiting alcohol consumption and following the plant food recommendation reduced the risk of dying from cancer by the greatest margin, 21 per cent and 17 per cent respectively.
    The study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, is the first to examine breastfeeding as part of a combination of lifestyle changes to see what effect it has on risk of dying.
    It showed that women who breastfed for at least six months reduced their risk of death from cancer by 10 per cent and circulatory disease by 17 per cent.
    Uncommon: Despite the proven benefits of breastfeeding for a longer period of time, less than two per cent of UK babies are breastfed exclusively for six months
    Uncommon: Despite the proven benefits of breastfeeding for a longer period of time, less than two per cent of UK babies are breastfed exclusively for six months
    Previous research found strong evidence that breastfeeding can reduce the mother’s risk of breast cancer, with each year of breastfeeding reducing the risk of breast cancer by about 4 per cent.
    But only a small number of women in the UK breastfeed their babies for long periods. Less than two per cent of babies are breastfed exclusively for six months.
    It was also the first time scientists have examined the relationship between adherence to diet and lifestyle recommendations and respiratory disease deaths.
    Dr Panagiota Mitrou, deputy head of science at WCRF, said: ‘This study demonstrates in real terms the value of the WCRF/AICR recommendations in preventing deaths from a range of common diseases, not just cancer.
    ‘This evidence also highlights the importance of aspects of the Government’s public health policy around increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, promoting breastfeeding and curbing alcohol abuse.’


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2299685/Breastfeeding-months-cuts-risk-dying-cancer-10.html#ixzz2OtLrFHpW 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Pregnant women who sleep on their backs could be at greater risk of stillbirth, claim researchers

  • Women in Ghana were found to be at greater risk of stillbirth if they slept on their backs during pregnancy
  • May be because the position reduces blood flow from the lower part of the body to the heart 
  • Recent studies in Australia and New Zealand have also highlighted the potential risks of this sleeping position 


  •  

    Pregnant women who sleep on their backs are at greater risk of having a stillbirth
    Pregnant women who sleep on their backs are at greater risk of having a stillbirth
    Pregnant women who sleep on their backs are at greater risk of having a stillbirth, a new study suggests.
    Mothers-to-be in Ghana who slept in this position were found to be five times more likely to have a baby with a low birth weight, and for some women this resulted in a stillbirth, the researchers said.
    The researchers also claimed that more than a quarter of cases of stillbirth might be avoided simply by ensuring that women change their sleeping position.
    The study was conducted in Ghana where between 20 and 50 of every 1,000 babies are stillborn, compared with just 3.5 per 1,000 in the UK.
    But a recent study in New Zealand suggests that supine sleep - the technical term for sleeping on your back - is linked to higher stillbirth rates in high income countries, too.
    The study's senior author, Louise O'Brien, from the University of Michigan, said: ‘If maternal sleep position does play a role in stillbirth, encouraging pregnant women everywhere not to sleep on their back is a simple approach that may improve pregnancy outcomes.
    ‘In Ghana, inexpensive interventions are urgently needed to improve pregnancy outcomes. 
    ‘This is a behaviour that can be modified - encouraging women to avoid sleeping on their back would be a low-cost method to reduce stillbirths in Ghana and other low-income countries.
    ‘The data in this study suggests that more than one-quarter of stillbirths might be avoided by altering maternal sleep position.’
     

    Experts suggest that pregnant women try to sleep on their side, ideally on their left side because this can improve the blood flow to the placenta.
    In the new study the researchers interviewed women shortly after they had given birth at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana.
    Scientists found that those who had slept on their backs during pregnancy risked compression on the vein that carries deoxygenated blood from the lower part of the body to the heart. 
    This means the heart is not pumping as blood as effectively as it should, which may lead to stillbirth.
    Researchers said the study shows that giving pregnant women simple advice on how to sleep could radically reduce the number of stillbirths.
    This research supports a recent Australian study which suggested that pregnant women who sleep on their backs are six times more likely to have a stillborn baby.
    The researchers claim that a quarter of stillbirths in Ghana might be avoided by ensuring that women change their sleeping position
    The researchers claim that a quarter of stillbirths in Ghana might be avoided by ensuring that women change their sleeping position
    The study, known as the Sydney Stillbirth Study, looked at the pregnancies of 295 women from eight hospitals around Australia.
    The five-year study found that women who sleep on their backs are six times more likely to have a stillborn baby.
    Lead researcher Dr Adrienne Gordon, from Sydney's Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, said previous research had suggested prolonged periods in this position restricted blood flow to the baby.
    The researchers added it was important that women who are currently pregnant 'don’t become alarmed if they sometimes sleep on their back'.
    Commenting at the time, Emma Laing, midwifery manager for baby charity Tommy’s, told MailOnline: 'Given the small number of women monitored in this study, it would be impossible to say whether the findings can provide accurate recommendations for pregnant women about sleeping on their back during the latter stages of pregnancy.  
    'What we do know is that 20 per cent of the 4,000 stillbirths that happen each year in the UK remain unexplained, and we certainly need further research to find out why stillbirth happens. 
    'Should women have any concerns or feel their babies' movements have decreased, they should contact their midwife or speak to our midwives here at Tommy’s for advice.'
    Tommy’s midwives can be contacted on the charity’s freephone PregnancyLine: 0800 0147 800.

    STILLBIRTH: THE FACTS

    A stillborn baby is a baby born dead after 24 weeks of pregnancy. If the baby dies before 24 completed weeks, it is known as a late miscarriage.
    There are around 4,000 stillbirths every year in the UK and 11 babies are stillborn every day in the UK, making it ten times more common than cot death. 
    In almost half of stillbirths, the direct cause of the baby's death cannot be established. 
    Ten per cent of stillborn babies have some kind of abnormality and other possible causes include problems with the mother's health or problems with the placenta, which links the baby’s blood supply to the mother’s.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2299802/Pregnant-women-sleep-backs-greater-risk-stillbirth-claim-researchers.html#ixzz2OtLECOml 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Got a sexually transmitted disease and looking for love? No problem, just log on to a dating site for people with STIs

  • UK Positive Singles dating website has 30,000 members in the UK, accumulating 100,000 new members last year worldwide
  • Having a sexually transmitted disease makes many people withdraw from dating altogether
  • Many people contract STIs from long-term partners - and some only discover they've contracted an infection when they find out their partner has been unfaithful


  •  

    Dating can be a nightmare for many, so dating websites for people with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), can save embarrassment and rejection.
    The most difficult thing about Herpes and HIV is that it carries a social stigma, says dating website UK Positive Singles. When it comes to dating, you may have fewer choices because of your condition. 
    Also, if you are dating with other singles without an STI, you are most likely to be rejected by them after telling the truth.
    Matchmaker: STI dating website users can enter their age and sexual preference. Then they can search for people with a specific sexually transmitted infection
    Matchmaker: STI dating website users can enter their age and sexual preference. Then they can search for people with a specific sexually transmitted infection
    UK Positive Singles has 30,000 members in the UK, accumulating 100,000 new members last year worldwide - and DatePositive, which has more than 6,000 profiles, allow users to search for people with almost any sexually transmitted infection.
    Other websites such as H-YPE or H-Date, are aimed specifically at people with the most common types of incurable STIs, such as herpes and HPV, which causes genital warts.
     

    ‘If you have just been told you have herpes or HPV and you feel like your life is over, well, we are here to prove to you that it's not. In fact, it's a whole new start,’ it says on H-YPE.
    Once logged on to the websites, users enter age and sexual preference. Then they can search for people with a specific sexually transmitted infection. 
    The rise in these dating sites coincides with increasing rates of STIs. In the UK there was a two per cent rise in new cases from 2010-2011, according to the Health Protection Agency's latest statistics. More than 100,000 people in the UK are diagnosed with genital herpes or HPV every year.
    Meanwhile, there are about 20 million new STI cases each year in the US, and about 110 million in total, says the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    Drug resistant strains: There are more than 100 types of HPV, (human papilloma virus) of which more than 30 affect the genital area
    Drug resistant strains: There are more than 100 types of HPV, (human papilloma virus) of which more than 30 affect the genital area
    ‘[Some people] feel like freaks, like lepers,’ Max, 44, who set up dating site H-YPE., told BBC News.
    Kate, 36, from Manchester, who has herpes, thinks the stigma attached to STIs also means ‘people assume you've slept around’.
    In reality, many people contract STIs from long-term partners - and some people only discover they've contracted an infection at the same time they find out their partner has been unfaithful.
    Kate recalls how a promising relationship was ruined by the disclosure of her herpes. ‘It came up in conversation and I was petrified. It broke us. He didn't want to take any chances.’
    On most of these dating websites, users can write honestly about their feelings and no longer have to be secretive about their condition.
    Heartbreaker: Promising relationships can be ruined by the disclosure of a sexually transmitted infection
    Heartbreaker: Promising relationships can be ruined by the disclosure of a sexually transmitted infection
    There’s also a sense of community and support, and often there’s online counsellors and blogs from people sharing their experiences 
    But some people are concerned about the message STI dating websites could send. 
    ‘These sites can make people think 'now I am a leper I need to find a leper to date',’ says HVA (Herpes Viruses Association) director Marian Nicholson. ‘People shouldn't narrow their pool of potential partners.’
    ‘Just because you have the same STI as someone else, it doesn't mean they're the same as you in other respects,’ says Dr Pakianathan. ‘One STI doesn't preclude the presence of others.’
    For HIV sufferers, there's the risk of a ‘super infection’ from a drug-resistant strain carried by someone else, he says. And there are more 100 strains of HPV, of which more than 30 affect the genital area.


    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS ON THE RISE

    More than 15,000 under-16s were diagnosed with diseases including gonorrhoea, chlamydia and genital herpes in the last three years.
    The number of children aged under 16 with STIs nearly doubled in the last 10 years – and there are fears the situation could be worse because many boys do not get tested.
    Campaigners such as the Terrence Higgins Trust politicians for failing to make sex education compulsory.
    The Health Protection Agency figures, obtained by the Mirror under the Freedom of Information Act, revealed 13 children aged under 16 are diagnosed with STIs every single dayThe number of children aged under 16 with STIs spiralled by 93% from 2,474 in 2003 to 4,777 in 2011.
    Infections contracted included chlamydia, gonorrhoea, genital herpes, genital warts, chancroid and lymphogranuloma venereum.
    UK
    •    426,867 new diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections in 2011
    •    31,154 new cases of genital herpes
    •    76,071 of genital warts

    US
    •    110 million total (new and existing) STI cases
    •    20 million new STI cases a year 
    •    24 million people with HSV-2 (usually genital herpes) 
    •    79 million people with HPV (causes genital warts)


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2300571/Got-sexually-transmitted-disease-looking-love-No-problem-just-log-dating-site-people-STIs.html#ixzz2OtKN1cQ0 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Can your baby taste curry in the womb? And why does a newborn's skin smell so delicious? New book has the answer to the questions that tantalise every mother

  • Bumpology is Linda Geddes' attempt to answer those baffling questions
  • She reveals that babies can indeed be affected by their mother's mood
  • Bad news for fathers - 'Dada' only comes first because it's easier to say


  •  

    Why does the top of a newborn baby’s head smell so good? Can you train your baby to have healthy eating habits while still in the womb? And why do babies insist on mastering 'Dada' before 'Mama'? 
    These were some of the questions that intrigued science journalist Linda Geddes when she became pregnant for the first time. 
    She set out on a quest for definitive answers, which developed into an 18-month investigation into the science of pregnancy, birth and newborn babies. The result was her book Bumpology, a compendium of all things baby and bump-related...
    Bumpology: All your pregnancy questions answered - and yes, that includes why newborns smell nice!
    Bumpology: All your pregnancy questions answered - and yes, that includes why newborns smell nice!
    WHY DO NEWBORN BABIES SMELL SO GOOD?
    There’s something intoxicating about the milky smell of a newborn. Many mothers admit to spending hours inhaling their baby’s odour. 

     

    And for good reason — several studies have shown that women can pick out the scent of their baby from other newborns just a few days after giving birth. 
    Parents may also be able to detect a similarity between their baby’s smell and that of other close family members.  
    We don’t know precisely where these  olfactory signals come from, but scientists think it may be the baby’s sebaceous glands — the tiny oil producers which tend to be particularly active in newborn babies, especially on the head and face. 
    Body odour is influenced by what we eat, so breast-feeding may also contribute to that delicious new-baby smell. 
    CAN YOUR UNBORN BABY TASTE YOUR SPICY TAKEAWAY?
    Many women believe eating curry in late pregnancy will bring on labour. The taste buds on a baby’s tongue begin to develop 13 to 15 weeks into pregnancy, enabling him or her to detect simple tastes such as sweet, sour and salty in the womb. 
    Smells and flavours from a mother’s food get into the amniotic fluid surrounding the baby during the third trimester, and as a foetus breathes and swallows around a litre of this a day, which then passes over smell and taste receptors in the nose and mouth, unborn babies do get a taste of what their mum is eating.  
    Spicy: Can unborn babies really taste strong flavours like these? According to Geddes, they certainly can
    Spicy: Can unborn babies really taste strong flavours like these? According to Geddes, they certainly can
    CAN YOU TRAIN YOUR UNBORN BABY TO HAVE HEALTHY EATING HABITS IN LATER LIFE?
    It seems that the memory of tastes experienced in the womb influences the foods babies like in later life. 
    Studies have shown that if Mum drinks a glass of carrot juice four times a week in the last trimester (or the first two months of breastfeeding) her baby will find cereal prepared with carrot juice appealing once weaned. 
    Babies whose mothers eat a lot of fruit during pregnancy are also more likely to enjoy fruit during weaning. 
    Trying to eat as many different flavours as possible should, therefore, expose your unborn or breastfeeding baby to different tastes and, in theory make them less prone to fussy eating. 
    CAN A BABY DETECT ITS MOTHER'S MOOD IN THE WOMB?
    How a mother feels during pregnancy can certainly affect her unborn baby’s movements. 
    In a study at Japan’s Nagasaki University, ten women in their last trimester were shown an uplifting clip from the film The Sound Of Music — in which Julie Andrews skips gaily through alpine meadows — while their baby’s movements were monitored by ultrasound. 
    The women also watched a tear‑jerking clip from boxing film The Champ. They wore earphones, so the baby couldn’t hear the soundtrack.
    When the women watched the 'happy' film, their babies seemed stimulated and waved their arms. But during the sad film their movements decreased. 
    Although the study included only a small number of women, it does at least hint that a baby can detect its mother’s mood. 
    It’s thought this might occur because hormones, such as adrenaline, are released during times of stress or sadness and can redirect blood flow away from the uterus, which the baby picks up on. 
    Feelgood factor: Happy films such as The Sound of Music encourage babies to move around more
    Feelgood factor: Happy films such as The Sound of Music encourage babies to move around more

    Blue for babies: All babies have them to start with but eye colour changes at 10 months
    Blue for babies: All babies have them to start with but eye colour changes at 10 months 
    WHY DO NEWBORNS HAVE BLUE EYES?
    Eye colour is inherited, determined by the amount of a pigment called melanin that we produce. People who don’t produce much melanin have blue or grey eyes, while those who produce lots have brown eyes. 
    At birth, however, very little melanin is produced — regardless of genes. This is why most babies’ eyes appear blue or blue-grey. But as babies’ eyes are exposed to the light, the body’s production of melanin is ramped up. 
    If a baby is genetically programmed to produce lots of melanin, their eye colour will begin to change as the months go by. A baby’s eye colour will usually settle down around the age of six months and is unlikely to change much after this.
    ARE SUMMER-BORN BABIES DIFFERENT FROM WINTER BABIES?
    If a baby is born in the UK between September and December, they are statistically twice as likely to become a professional football player as a baby born in the summer months. 
    Unfortunately they are also slightly more likely to suffer from panic attacks and, if male, to become an alcoholic in adulthood. 
    Meanwhile, if you’re ambitious for your child to become a doctor, you might aim for an April-June birthday. 
    The effect of our birth month on our health is small, but significant enough that it can’t be dismissed. For example, babies born in the northern hemisphere in February, March and April are 5-10 per cent more likely to develop schizophrenia (one of the best-studied season-linked disorders). 
    Different factors are likely to be at work here. Some studies have suggested that the increased risk of schizophrenia among babies born in the springtime is the result of their mother being exposed to viruses such as influenza during a critical period of pregnancy. 
    More recently, scientists have proposed that vitamin D deficiency caused by low levels of sunlight during an autumn/winter pregnancy may be to blame, or that varying levels of brain chemicals such as serotonin and dopamine at different times of the year may play a role. 
    Looks DO matter: Babies fixate on faces that are attractive. Angelina Jolie and David Gandy are certain to be popularLooks DO matter: Babies fixate on faces that are attractive. Angelina Jolie and David Gandy are certain to be popular

    Looks matter: Babies fixate on faces that are attractive: Angelina Jolie and David Gandy are sure to be popular
    DO BABIES LIKE SOME PEOPLE BETTER THAN OTHERS?
    Some people love babies, others can’t stand them — and little ones feel the same about us. 
    Given a choice between photographs of two faces — one that had been rated as attractive by a group of adults and one rated unattractive — a newborn baby will choose to fixate on the more appealing face. 
    But babies don’t just judge books by their covers. Newborns get upset if people’s facial expressions suggest they’re not responding to them. 
    Experiments with babies as young as three hours old have shown that if their mother pulls a blank, expressionless face, the baby responds by decreasing their eye contact and showing signs of distress. 
    This suggests that babies are born with certain expectations regarding the rules of communication — much like the rest of us.
    WHY DO BABIES SAY 'DADA' BEFORE 'MAMA'?
    Learning to speak requires the coordination of more than 70 different muscles and body parts, so it’s not until around seven or eight months of age that babies start to babble. 
    Barbara L. Davis, of the University of Texas, travels the world trying to capture these first utterances and make sense of them using a tiny microphone attached to a bib.
    From China to Holland, Ecuador to the UK and beyond, she says children are extremely alike during this babbling period. 
    Sounds such as 'b', 'd', 'm' and 'g' combined with 'ah' seem to be easiest to make, so that’s where babies start. 
    Although many parents assume that 'Mama' and 'Dada' are among babies’ first words because these are the people who are important to them, baby babble doesn’t start taking on meaning until around ten months. 
    Many babies do tend to say 'da' before 'ma', though, because early speech sounds tend to be produced by moving the lips, jaw and soft palate simultaneously. 
    This is how we make 'ba' and 'da' sounds. 'Ma' requires us to move the lips and jaw but relax the soft palate — a more complex operation. 
    Simple sounds: Babies say 'Dada' first because its easier to pronounce than the more complex 'Mama'
    Simple sounds: Babies say 'Dada' first because its easier to pronounce than the more complex 'Mama'
    WHY DO WE SPEAK TO BABIES IN A SILLY VOICE?
    We’ve all caught ourselves talking in a sing-song voice to babies, but does sounding silly really serve any purpose? 
    The fact is, parents across the world show a common pattern when talking to babies. They raise the pitch of their voice, speak more slowly, elongate the vowels, repeat themselves and exaggerate changes in intonation. And there seems to be a good reason why. 
    Recent research at Brown University in the U.S. showed that elongating vowel sounds when talking to toddlers enhanced their ability to recognise words. 
    The exaggerated way we interact with babies seems to be important, too, for capturing their attention.
    Bumpology by Linda Geddes is published by Bantam, priced £14.99. To order your copy for the special price of £11.99 (incl. P&P) call 0844 472 4157.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2300145/Can-baby-taste-curry-womb-And-does-newborns-skin-smell-delicious-New-book-answers.html#ixzz2OtEM2Jt7 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook