Monday, April 27, 2015

The second baby window: As a new study analyses the mental and physical effect of the 'interpregnancy interval' on mothers, what is the right amount of time to wait before conceiving again?

  • A study found women with short birth intervals have increased health risks
  • Women who waited longer than 60 months can suffer physical harm too
  • Pre-eclampsia, anaemia and emotional anguish are risk to mums
  • The 'ideal' time for women to space births is at least 24 months apart




  • Pregnancy might not always be planned, but a new study suggests timing is everything.
    The study found that the gap between the birth of one child and the conception of another, also known as the 'interpregnancy interval' (IPI) can significantly affect the mental and physical condition of the mother-to-be.
    Analysing the data of 1,723,084 women who had births from 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) found the IPI can have adverse health outcomes for women both with short birth intervals and long birth intervals.
    How long should you wait? a study has found that the gap between the birth of one child and the conception of another can significantly affect the mental and physical condition of the mother-to-be
    A short interval is defined as women who fall pregnant in less than 18 months and long intervals extent to a gap of 60 months. 
    From those surveyed, it was found that 30 per cent didn't wait long enough, falling pregnant again in less than 18 months after giving birth.
    The study found short intervals may affect the risk of pregnancy complications to the baby such as pre-term birth, low birth weight, and small gestational age.
    There is also a impact on the mothers too.
    Leading Sydney obstetrician and senior lecturer at the University of Sydney, Dr Sean Seeho said for women conceiving in a short interval, it's often a case of whether they are emotionally and physically ready for the next pregnancy. 




    Age gap: The study found an interval of less than 18 months may affect the risk of pregnancy complications to the baby such as pre-term birth, low birth weight, and small gestational age
    Age gap: The study found an interval of less than 18 months may affect the risk of pregnancy complications to the baby such as pre-term birth, low birth weight, and small gestational age
    'There is a burden on mothers to produce red blood cells so that babies can get folate and because mums become anaemic following the birth of a baby it means they don’t get much time to recover from birth before pregnant again.'
    Dr Seeho notes that the stress of a first time mum can also play a large role.
    'One in five women get the baby blues, so if they go into a pregnancy and haven’t dealt with their post natal depression then they will definitely have issues again during that pregnancy as they haven't left time to treat it adequately,' he said.
    Peace Mitchell, a Melbourne-based mother and entrepreneur who has had three children in under four years said her third pregnancy took its toll.
    'The third pregnancy was quite hard physically, towards the end I had difficulty walking and I couldn't carry the other children because the pregnancy was taking such a toll on my body.'
    Physical stress: Peace Mitchell, a Melbourne-based mother and entrepreneur who has had three children in under four years said her third pregnancy took its toll
    Physical stress: Peace Mitchell, a Melbourne-based mother and entrepreneur who has had three children in under four years said her third pregnancy took its toll
    'It was also hard because they were still little they need a lot of extra attention, so I struggled. My middle child also wasn't impressed at all when I had my third son 20 months later,' she adds.
    'He didn't want to look at the baby, he would try to hurt it and be aggressive and that was difficult, he was a baby himself and I couldn't give him the attention he needed.'

    A previous study as reported in the Iowa Medicaid Birth Certificate Report also found short birth intervals can have a higher risk of maternal mortality and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy including bleeding and anaemia.
    Those in developing countries are likely to be the most affected though, according to Dr Seeho as they have a higher risk of blood loss and nutritional deprivation.
    Yet, on the other side, women who wait up to five years to have another child can also face increased health risks.
    Leading Sydney obstetrician Dr Sean Seeho said for women conceiving in a short interval, it's often a case of whether they are emotionally and physically ready for the next pregnancy
    Leading Sydney obstetrician Dr Sean Seeho said for women conceiving in a short interval, it's often a case of whether they are emotionally and physically ready for the next pregnancy

    'We know that high blood pressure increases in older mums, as does the risk of kidney disorders and diabetes so if there is a pre-existing condition, there's a need to optimise blood pressure and make sure physical and emotional health is good first,' says Dr Seeho. 
    'Also, if in five years the woman has changed partners there are high risks associated with pre-pre-eclampsia.'
    Overall Dr Seeho's believes there isn't one window that best works for the woman as long as she is physically and emotionally ready.
    Mitchell also can attest to this, when eight years on she had a fourth child and had no issues at all.
    'I turned 40 and was worried my body wouldn't hold up but it was the best pregnancy I had. I also had the boys at school and had time and energy to give to her.'
    However the CDCP study did find factors such as age and race can also affect the impact on birth and that women under aged 20 tend to have closer interpregnancy intervals of 11-14 months whereas women aged 40 or older would wait between 39-76 months.
    While the verdict is still out on whether there is one optimal interpregnancy interval, the World Health Organisation currently suggests a interval period of at least 24 months is the best outcome for mums.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3056971/The-second-baby-window-new-study-analyses-mental-physical-effect-interpregnancy-interval-mothers-right-time-wait-conceiving-again.html#ixzz3YWV9wtne 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     

     

    Friday, April 24, 2015

    Anxiety is 'catching' and can be passed on to children, scientists warn over-protective parents

  • Study: It has long been known that anxiety runs within families
  • But new research shows a child's upbringing also has strong influence
  • Attitudes of over-anxious parents can severely affect children's behaviour 




  • They say parents never stop worrying about their children, but those anxieties can be catching, warn researchers.
    A new study of twins shows anxiety can pass between the generations – over and above the genetic ties that bind them.
    Although scientists have long known that anxiety runs within families, the study found the attitudes of over-anxious parents strongly affects their children’s behaviour.
    Because the study involved parents who were identical and non-identical twins, researchers were able to distinguish between the influence on children’s anxiety exerted by family genes and their upbringing.
    While scientists have long known that anxiety runs within families, this new study found the attitudes of over-anxious parents strongly affects their children’s behaviour
    While scientists have long known that anxiety runs within families, this new study found the attitudes of over-anxious parents strongly affects their children’s behaviour
    The research carried out by scientists at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London, was published in the American Journal of Psychiatry.
    Journal editor Dr Robert Freedman said: 'This study is a landmark, because it is the first to clearly establish the early transmission of anxiety symptoms from parents to children, not through their shared genetic background, but rather from the way in which anxious parents raise their children.
    ‘Parents who are anxious can now be counselled and educated on ways to minimise the impact of their anxiety on the child's development.'



    Anxiety disorders are common, with a one in three chance of occurring during one’s lifetime, and they tend to start early in life around the age of 11.
    A unique ‘children of twins’ study design allowed scientists to examine the development of anxiety among almost 1,000 families containing parental sets of identical and non-identical same-sex twins aged 45 on average.
    By comparing data on anxiety symptoms for children and their parent and contrasting this with similar data for children and their parent’s identical co-twin, researchers could examine the influence of living with one’s parent over and above simply receiving 50 per cent of their genes.

    By looking at anxiety symptoms between children and their twin uncle and aunt from families with identical twins, compared to non-identical twin families, it was possible to estimate the effect of genetic vs environmental factors affecting transmission from one generation to another.
    Adult parents from identical twin pairs were found to show greater similarity in anxiety levels to their own adolescent children than their nieces and nephews.
    This suggests that living together is a key driver within families for anxiety, even after accounting for the genetic influence.

    ANXIETY AND STRESS 'NOT VALID EXCUSES FOR TIME OFF WORK'

    Nearly seven in ten bosses believe stress, anxiety or depression are not valid excuses for taking time off, a survey has found.
    Most bosses think mental illness does not warrant time off work – even though a quarter of employees suffer from such problems at some point each year.
    A thousand managers, executives and company owners as well as a thousand employees were asked to take part in the survey, carried out by AXA PPP healthcare.
    The findings revealed that most workers are so worried about the stigma surrounding mental health that they would not tell their bosses the truth about why they were calling in sick
    But 69 per cent of bosses do not think it is a valid excuse, according to the research – but about one in four conceded that they had experience some form of mental illness in the past. 
    The findings suggest parents with anxiety disorders need not resign themselves to their children bearing the same traits, according to Professor Thalia Eley, lead author from the IoPPN at King’s College London.
    She said: ‘Our research shows that even if you have had to cope with high levels of anxiety yourself, it is not inevitable that this will follow in your children.
    ‘There are many things that can be done at home to prevent or reduce anxiety in children and adolescents.
    ‘While a natural tendency when your child is anxious is to try to protect them, it can be more helpful to support them in taking small age-appropriate risks.'
    She added: ‘This will teach them that the world is generally a safe place and they can manage situations that initially seem stressful, developing their sense of mastery and in turn promoting resilience.
    ‘This approach applies equally to families with parents who are not anxious themselves but who have a child who appears to worry more about life than others.
    ‘Similarly, when events have not gone as well as a child has hoped, it can be helpful to encourage them to consider explanations that do not put them off trying again and that offer them a positive route forwards.’
    Professor Eley said research was needed to clarify whether anxiety in children and adolescents elicits anxiety in parents, or whether anxious children and adolescents learn to view the world as threatening because they see their parent interpret it in such a way.
    ‘This would help us decide whether to focus intervention largely at the parent or child level’,' she added. 


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3053778/Anxiety-catching-passed-children-scientists-warn-protective-parents.html#ixzz3YFcJH4is 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     

     

    Monday, April 20, 2015

    Contraceptive pill can 'make women more anxious by shrinking part of their brain', study warns

  • UCLA study found the Pill shrinks two parts of the brain linked to emotion
  • Synthetic hormones found in the contraceptive are thought to be to blame
  • Believe it could account for increased anxiety and depressive episodes 





  • A new study has suggested the oral contraceptive pill could shrink parts of the brain that govern a woman's emotions 
    For the 100 million women worldwide on the contraceptive pill, the side effects are familiar.
    Mood swings, headaches and nausea, while more serious complications include blood clots and breast cancer.
    But scientists in California have added another potential cause for concern to the check list.
    Their new study has found the oral contraceptive shrinks two key regions of the brain, changing the way they function.
    The findings suggest the synthetic hormones found in the Pill cause these alterations in brain structure and function.
    Furthermore the ingredient is thought to suppress the natural hormones that occur when women take the Pill.
    Neuroscientists at UCLA examined the brains of 90 women, 44 of whom took the Pill, and 46 who experienced natural cycles.
    They found the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the posterior cigulate cortex were thinner in those women taking the contraception. 
    The lateral orbitofrontal cortex plays an important role in regulating a person's emotions and their response to rewards.
    As a result the changes noted by researchers could, they say, be responsible for increased anxiety and depressive symptoms experienced by some women on the Pill. 
    Meanwhile the posterior cingulate cortex governs the 'internal state', or inward-directed thought, helps process emotions and retrieve memories.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3043512/Contraceptive-pill-make-women-anxious-shrinking-brain-study-warns.html#ixzz3XsbOXDYW 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
    Nicole Petersen, the study's lead author, told The Huffington Post: 'Some women experience negative emotional side effects from taking oral contraceptive pills, although the scientific findings investigating that have been mixed.
    'So it's possible that this change in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex may be related to the emotional changes that some women experience when using birth control pills.' 

    Researchers said they do not yet know if these changes to the brain are permanent, or if they only last while a woman is taking the Pill.
    Dr Petersen said more research is needed, but added that this study is the first step.
     The latest study comes five years after research by the Royal College of General Practitioners revealed Pill-users have a 12 per cent reduction in their risk of developing cancer.
    Scientists at UCLA found the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the posterior cigulate cortex were thinner in those women taking the contraception. They believe it could account for increased anxiety and depressive symptoms experienced by some women taking the Pill
    Scientists at UCLA found the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the posterior cigulate cortex were thinner in those women taking the contraception. They believe it could account for increased anxiety and depressive symptoms experienced by some women taking the Pill
    The researchers studied 46,000 women across four decades, and found those on the Pill were less likely to die of cancer, heart disease or stroke.
    It contradicts past studies that have linked the Pill to breast cancer.
    The risks associated with taking the Pill are increased if a woman smokes, has a family history of thrombosis, is severely overweight, diabetic, has a high blood pressure or high cholesterol level.

    The study was published in the journal Human Brain Mapping. 


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3043512/Contraceptive-pill-make-women-anxious-shrinking-brain-study-warns.html#ixzz3XsbbQ3xr 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    HOW TO BEAT... HEART DISEASE: Why it isn't fat that clogs up your arteries and how the true villain may surprise you!

  • This week, the Mail will publish series of articles on how to keep healthy
  • The cause of heart problems has become the subject of much debate
  • In this feature, we offer 15 great tips on how to keep the organ healthy




  • What causes heart disease? A simple enough question, and one you might have thought was settled years ago.
    But the answer has become a subject of much debate — with implications for many of us on how we lead our lives and the medication we take.
    For years the finger of blame has pointed at cholesterol, a fatty substance produced by the liver.
    Scroll down for video 
    While some cholesterol is vital (it helps produce hormones and vitamin D, for instance), the consensus has been that too much — or rather, too much of the bad form, known as low density lipoproteins (LDL) — damages the blood vessels. This leads to risk of blood clots, heart attacks and stroke.
    This thinking was confirmed in 2004 by the hugely influential Interheart study reported in the Lancet, which showed that 45 per cent of deaths from heart disease were caused by high cholesterol — making it the biggest modifiable cause, along with smoking, and outstripping causes such as high blood pressure and obesity.
    The message on cholesterol has been twofold: avoid foods rich in cholesterol-raising saturated fat such as butter, cream, milk and cheese, and if you’re at risk of heart disease, take cholesterol-busting statins.
    But is it time this two-track approach was rethought?




    CUTTING FAT CAN BE BAD FOR YOU
    Cutting cholesterol has been a success, according to Professor Peter Weissberg, medical director of the British Heart Foundation, who says better diet — plus a four-fold drop in tobacco use — helped to halve death rates from heart disease between 1961 and 2011. 
    ‘In the early Sixties, consumption of foods high in saturated fat such as butter, whole milk and red meat was the norm — but they have largely been replaced by low-fat spreads, vegetable oils, skimmed milk and white meat,’ he says.
    Yet today there are gaping holes in this ‘cholesterol hypothesis’ — with a growing number of specialists insisting the traditional heart health message is over-simplistic.
    The relationship is not as black and white as we thought, says Dr Rajiv Chowdhury, a cardiovascular epidemiologist and a Gates Scholar at Cambridge University.
    He led a major review of 72 studies that suggested saturated fat doesn’t cause heart disease.
    ‘While earlier studies showed saturated fat does raise bad cholesterol, the bigger picture shows it also increases potentially good cholesterol, which reduces bad fats in blood,’ he says. The findings were controversial, but Dr Chowdhury is one of an increasing number of scientists who believe current heart health advice is misguided, if not harmful.
    ‘The mantra that saturated fat must be removed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease has dominated dietary advice and guidelines for decades and led to a Government obsession with levels of total cholesterol,’ says Dr Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist and medical adviser to the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges.
    ‘Yet the scientific evidence shows this advice has increased our cardiovascular risks.’
    Saturated fat has various subtypes that vary widely in their health effects, says Dr Chowdhury. ‘Without considering these, it’s got to be harmful to replace all saturated fats with sugar or refined carbohydrates — as food manufacturers have been doing in the interests of heart health.’
    LOW CHOLESTEROL MAY BE RISKY
    The second line of attack is statins, which have been shown to reduce cholesterol even in healthy people, and prevent heart attacks in those with risk factors.
    Though they were originally targeted at people with a 30 per cent risk of a heart attack in the next ten years, guidelines have been changed twice (in 2006 and last year), lowering the threshold.

    CAN 'WONDER MARGE' CUT YOUR HEART ATTACK RISK?

    Could ‘heart healthy’ special spreads, yoghurts and mini-drinks help lower cholesterol? Yes, according to the cholesterol charity Heart UK, which claims 4 tsp to 6 tsp of one of the spreads or a mini-drink a day can lower bad cholesterol by up to 10 per cent in two to three weeks.
    That’s because they contain plant sterols that mimic human cholesterol and so, it’s claimed, effectively block its absorption into the bloodstream. Some experts, though, suggest Heart UK makes too much of the benefits of sterol-enriched foods.
    Even a 10 per cent reduction won’t make that much difference to your health status, says Peter Weissberg, former Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine at the University of Cambridge and medical director of the British Heart Foundation.
    ‘While there’s some evidence plant sterols do reduce cholesterol marginally, there’s no evidence whatsoever they contribute to a reduction in heart attacks.’
    Others experts point to research that has suggested sterols can even have a negative effect, raising people’s heart disease risk.
    Dr Malcolm Kendrick, a GP and author of the Great Cholesterol Con, says: ‘Replacing human cholesterol with the plant version is hardly likely to be healthy.’
    Now anyone with a 10 per cent risk of developing cardiovascular disease within the next ten years should be offered a statin, says the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). It says that if everyone at risk took a statin, 8,000 lives could be saved and 28,000 heart attacks prevented a year.
    By last year, up to ten million Britons were taking the drugs. Of these, one and a half million had survived a heart attack; two million had severe chest pain (angina); with the remainder at risk because of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity, smoking or diabetes.
    ‘To make progress in the battle against heart disease, we must encourage exercise, improve our diets still further, stop smoking and where appropriate offer statins,’ says Professor Mark Baker, director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE.
    ‘The overwhelming body of evidence supports the use of statins even in people at low risk.’
    Yet the evidence is not conclusive. One difficult piece of research to explain, published in the American Heart journal in 2009, showed 75 per cent of patients admitted to hospital with a heart attack had cholesterol levels within the safe range; 50 per cent had optimal levels of cholesterol.
    Furthermore, your cholesterol falls naturally with age, particularly in older people with chronic health problems.
    And it may be unhealthy to have low levels. A 20-year study published in the Lancet in 2001 showed long-term low cholesterol increases the risk of premature death — ‘and the earlier that patients start to have lower cholesterol, the greater the risk’.
    ‘Cholesterol is wrongly still being demonised as the killer substance,’ says Dr Malcolm Kendrick, a GP and author of the Cholesterol Con. ‘When I tell people the higher their cholesterol level the longer they will live, they look at me as if my medication is not working. They are misguided.’
    So, if cholesterol’s role is over-played, what does cause heart disease?
    One emerging theory is sugar, which is thought to promote inflammation inside the arteries. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found adults who have three sugary drinks a day had triple the chance of a heart attack. One theory is that sugar encourages a particular type of ‘bad’ cholesterol that causes inflammation.
    There are at least five major types of LDL, the low-density lipoprotein that transports cholesterol around the body.

    WHY A BLOOD PRESSURE CHECK CAN SAVE YOUR LIFE 

    Blood pressure, the force that blood puts on artery walls as it is pumped around the body, is crucial to health. If it’s too high, it puts strain on the heart and blood vessels over time. High blood pressure is a major cause of heart disease and the leading risk factor for strokes.
    But as there are no symptoms, it can remain untreated. While seven million adults in England have been diagnosed with high blood pressure, a further five million are unaware they, too, are affected, according to a recent report.
    Under current guidelines, people with low to normal blood pressure should have it checked only every five years. However, if you are overweight, over 65, smoke, have a family history of high blood pressure or are of African or Caribbean descent, you should be checked more often, even if your pressure appears to be normal.
    A recent Public Health England report warns high blood pressure is not being picked up soon enough, and suggests everyone should have their blood pressure tested at any opportunity.
    Regular monitoring or self- monitoring could also help to identify those who suffer from dramatically fluctuating high blood pressure. Work by Professor Peter Rothwell, of the Oxford Stroke Prevention Research Unit, found that people who had significant swings in blood pressure had a 15-fold increased risk of a stroke.
    Such people would benefit most from calcium channel blockers, which stabilise blood pressure (drugs such as ACE inhibitors and beta blockers reduce it).
    The healthiest is ‘large and fluffy,’ says Dr Chowdhury. It’s the smallest, most dense forms that are most dangerous because they can penetrate artery walls, setting off inflammation. ‘It looks likely these smaller, artery-clogging particles are increased not by saturated fat — but by sugary foods,’ he says.
    As Dr Michael Rothberg, vice president at the Medicine Institute in Cleveland, says: ‘The image of coronary arteries as kitchen pipes clogged with fat is simple — but wrong.’ The overwhelming evidence was that ‘most’ heart attacks occur to people whose arteries have only mild cholesterol plaques.
    ‘We now know coronary artery disease is an inflammatory disease in which cholesterol from the blood is deposited in artery walls and causes an inflammatory reaction like a pimple,’ he says.
    ‘It’s when these pimples pop that the blood in the arteries can clot. If the clot closes the artery, that causes a heart attack.’ British experts acknowledge that the theory that inflammation is caused by sugar needs investigation.
    ‘So far the concerns about sugar largely relate to obesity and diabetes,’ says Susan Jebb, Professor of Diet and Population Health at Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences.
    ‘But it’s probably true chronic inflammation is one reason that obesity and some dietary components such as sugar lead to an increased risk of heart disease.’
    Simon Capewell, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology at the University of Liverpool, is concerned the potential risk of sugar is not being highlighted.
    ‘The research shows adults who regularly consume sugary drinks increase their risk of heart disease and have an increased risk of dying from a heart attack,’ he says.
    ‘I’m sure part of that increased risk is that the extra sugar leads to raised blood pressure — and part of that is by increasing arterial inflammation.’
    Many experts still agree that controlling ‘bad’ LDL cholesterol is an important key to heart health — and you’ll find useful advice on doing so in this supplement. But increasingly researchers are suggesting it’s part of a bigger picture, with reducing arterial inflammation as the overall priority.
    Intriguingly, some evidence suggests statins may make an unexpected contribution here, reducing inflammation as well as performing their familiar duty of cutting cholesterol.
    In the words of Dr Malhotra: ‘Anything that can be done to reduce inflammation, whether it’s switching to a Mediterranean diet, stopping smoking, exercising, reducing stress and taking medication including perhaps statins, will be helpful.’

    HOW TO BEAT HEART DISEASE: 15 WAYS TO HELP YOUR HEART 

    1. HAVE A WEEKLY SAUNA
    Regular saunas could cut the risk of heart disease by as much as 60 per cent, according to a recent Finnish study.
    Middle-aged men who took frequent saunas were half as likely to die from heart conditions as those who didn’t take them.
    The heat raises heart rate, which effectively ‘exercises’ your cardiovascular system.
    However, Dr Edward Langford, a consultant cardiologist at Sevenoaks Medical Centre, warns: ‘Sudden stress in those with heart disease may precipitate a heart problem.’
    2. BREAKFAST ON PORRIDGE
    Oats contain a soluble fibre, beta-glucan, which lowers bad cholesterol. It forms a thick gel like wallpaper paste, which binds to cholesterol in the gut and prevents its absorption into the bloodstream.
    Just 3g of beta-glucan a day (an average-sized bowl of porridge or muesli provides 1.5g) can reduce cholesterol by 5 to 10 per cent, says dietitian Dr Sarah Schenker. She suggests snacking on oatcakes (1g of beta-glucan each) or switching to oat bread (such as Hovis Hearty loaf, 0.5g beta-glucan a slice).
    Nuts have a beneficial effect on cholesterol levels, too, possibly because they contain plant sterols, which block the absorption of cholesterol. Try to eat a handful (20 almonds, ten brazils or 15 cashews or walnuts) every day.
    3. MAKE SURE YOU FLOSS REGULARLY
    Gum disease has been linked to hardening of the arteries and heart attacks — the bacteria that cause tooth decay are thought to trigger inflammation, which has been linked to heart disease.
    Experts recommend brushing regularly and flossing religiously (and that’s not just when there’s food stuck between your teeth — flossing also breaks down the biofilm that traps the gluey mass of bacteria).
    4. HAVE SEX TWICE A WEEK
    Men who have sex at least twice a week are 45 per cent less likely to develop heart disease than those who do so once a month or less, says an American Journal of Cardiology study. ‘This is probably due to physical and emotional benefits, and stress reduction,’ says cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra.
    5. WEAR A SLEEP MASK
    Lack of sleep is linked to a greater risk of heart attack death: fewer than six hours a night raises it by half, says a study by Warwick University. Lack of sleep interferes with the appetite hormones ghrelin and leptin, leading to obesity.
    Ensure that your bedroom is dark or wear a sleep mask, as light suppresses production of the sleep hormone melatonin.
    6. CUT OUT SUGAR 
    U.S. studies published last year suggest that sugar may be a greater contributor to high blood pressure than salt. They found that attempts to lower salt levels were driving people to increase their consumption of starches and sugars.
    Dr James DiNicolantonio, a cardio- vascular research scientist at St Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, who led the study, says: ‘Encouraging consumers to say no to sugar, not to salt, may be the better dietary strategy to achieve blood pressure control.’
    7. BOOK A SUNNY HOLIDAY
    Going on holiday regularly cuts the risk of dying from heart disease by a third, say researchers at the University of Pittsburgh.
    And a holiday somewhere sunny could boost the benefits. Last year, the universities of Southampton and Edinburgh found that sunshine alters levels of nitric oxide, which relaxes blood vessels, helping blood pressure to fall.
    8. EAT A POT OF YOGHURT
    A daily dose of ‘good bacteria’ or probiotics (from a live yoghurt or supplement) could help to lower blood pressure, particularly in people with higher readings, according to a study from the Griffith Health Institute and School of Medicine in Australia.
    One theory is that the ‘good’ bacteria counteract the inflammatory process linked to heart disease.
    9. WATCH A FUNNY FILM WITH FRIENDS
    A good belly laugh can boost blood flow by more than 20 per cent — and some studies suggest its stress-busting effect can reduce the risk of heart disease. Research by Robert Provine, a U.S. professor of psych-ology and neuroscience, suggests that we are 30 times more likely to laugh when we are with other people.
    10. DON'T DELAY GOING TO THE LOO 
    A small study of people with early heart disease in Taiwan suggested that an over-full bladder can cause your heart to beat faster and put unnecessary stress on coronary arteries, triggering them to contract.
    11. GET A SIT-STAND DESK
    Research suggests sitting for eight hours a day raises the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes by 40 per cent.
    One study found sitting for more than four hours means you’re twice as likely to get heart disease, even if you work out.
    Try a ‘sit-stand’ attachment, which lets you raise or lower your computer.
    ‘Build your standing time to the point where you can happily stand for 30 minutes,’ says John Buckley, professor of applied exercise science at Chester University. Aim for a total of two hours at least, ideally four, a day.
    VARIDESK, from £275, uk.varidesk.com
    12. DOWNLOAD A 'MINDFULNESS' APP
    A recent study by Brown University in the U.S. found that people who are ‘mindful’ (they have a heightened sense of what they’re feeling and thinking at any given moment) are 83 per cent more likely to have a healthy heart. Though mindfulness — a form of meditation — is known to be deeply relaxing, the study’s lead author, epidemiologist Professor Eric Loucks, says mindful people also usually lead healthier lives.
    Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra recommends Headspace, an app that teaches mindfulness techniques.
    Head space, free for ten days, then £8.95 a month.
    13. CUT BACK ON SALAMI
    Vegetarians have a lower risk of heart disease — but if you can’t stomach going fully veggie, a recent Harvard study found that switching from three meat-based meals a day to three a week cuts heart disease risk by 19 per cent.
    Replace meat with foods rich in vegetable oils, nuts and seeds, and fruit, vegetables and pulses to boost your fibre intake. An extra 20g of fibre could lower bad cholesterol levels by 12 per cent.
    Pay particular attention to processed red meat such as sausages, salami, bacon and ham. A Swedish study last year found that men who ate the most processed red meat were more than twice as likely to die from heart failure.
    14. LOSE HALF A STONE
    Studies have consistently shown that losing 5 to 10 per cent of your bodyweight — 7lb if you weigh 12st, 10lb if you weigh 15st — can lower blood pressure, reduce ‘bad’ LDL cholesterol and blood fats, inflammation and blood sugar levels, and have a real impact on your heart health, especially if the excess weight had accumulated round your waist.
    15. GLUG A LITTLE OLIVE OIL EVERY DAY
    The Mediterranean diet — which is rich in fish, vegetables, fruit and olive oil — can protect against heart disease.
    But it’s olive oil in particular that appears to have a potent anti-inflammatory effect.
    Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who says he has at least 4tbsp of extra virgin olive oil a day, explains: ‘Olive oil contains compounds called polyphenols as well as vitamin E, which together rapidly reduce the risk of blood clotting and have a positive impact on the chronic inflammation that is at the root of heart disease.
     
    Operations that could give your heart new life 
    When medication and lifestyle changes aren’t working, you may be offered one of two widely used procedures. Each is highly effective — provided it’s used for the right patients. Experts warn that patients need to understand exactly what each promises.
    The first option is a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) — often called angioplasties. About 92,000 are performed every year in Britain, making it the most common cardiac procedure.
    It’s designed to open up narrowed or blocked arteries and is carried out by ‘interventional’ cardiologists. It’s a keyhole procedure done through a small incision in the groin or arm and takes from 30 minutes to two hours. No anaesthetic is needed, though patients can be sedated.
    A PCI involves a combination of treatments — angioplasty, where a tiny balloon is inserted to ‘squash’ the fatty deposits that have narrowed or blocked the artery, and the insertion of a stent, a short wire-mesh tube to hold the artery open.
    Stents can be pure metal or ‘drug-eluting’, which means they slowly release a substance to prevent scar tissue growing into the artery and re-blocking it.
    DRIP-FEED DRUGS IN YOUR ARTERIES 
    These drug-eluting stents (DES), introduced in the late Seventies, have had a bumpy history. Their use plummeted in 2006 when research showed there was a 1 per cent risk of stent thrombosis, where a clot forms on the surface of the stent, potentially leading to a fatal heart attack.
    However, second generation drug-eluting stents have largely solved the problem. But now there’s concern that too many PCIs are being done inappropriately. They account for four out of five interventions for heart disease in Britain.
    When used as an emergency procedure following a heart attack or for people with unstable angina (sudden and severe chest pains), there is no doubt that PCI is the right course.
    ‘For them, it’s a life-saving procedure,’ says Dr Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist at Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey. ‘We know that for every 30 angioplasties carried out, one life is saved.’

    HOW WOMEN BRUSH OFF THE DANGER SIGNS AS INDIGESTION 

    Look at the risk factors for heart disease — and being a man is top of the list.
    ‘This suggests that women do not face a risk of heart disease — and that’s entirely misleading,’ says Anna Dominiczak, Professor of Medicine at Glasgow University’s Institute for Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences.
    Furthermore, women are more likely to die immediately after a heart attack. A French study of 5,000 heart attack patients found that nine in every 100 female patients died in hospital compared with four in 100 men.
    The research, published in the Archives of Cardiovascular Disease, found that the women had waited, on average, an hour before calling for help compared with 44 minutes for men.
    The researchers warned this 16-minute difference might be crucial.
    So why do women delay getting help? It’s partly because their heart attack symptoms can be different, says Dr Ghada Mikhail, a consultant cardiologist at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
    ‘While chest pain is almost always the first symptom in both sexes, women often report shortness of breath, upper back or stomach pain, nausea and fatigue, which are easily dismissed as panic attacks, indigestion or simply ageing.’
    One woman who knows the dangers of ignoring warning signs is Yvonne Genas, 55, a charity housing officer from Nottingham. She had a heart attack in November 2012.
    ‘I had all the classic symptoms — sweating, breathlessness, chest pain,’ she says. ‘But as I sat slumped over my desk, my colleagues looking on in horror, it didn’t occur to me I was seriously ill.
    ‘That night I took paracetamol and went to bed early. I went to work for the next three days, but the symptoms were worsening, I only went to the GP when I got a horrible cough.
    ‘She told me to get a taxi to A&E. Within an hour, tests showed I’d had a heart attack. The next day, I had surgery to open up a blocked artery. Eight days later, I was discharged with a bunch of drugs.
    ‘What stopped me from seeking help earlier? The fact I went to the gym regularly and thought I was fit. Now, I take time for myself.’
    However, about one in three PCIs is carried out on patients with stable angina and experts say the majority of these are a waste of time and money, as well as putting these patients at a small risk of internal bleeding, heart attack or stroke during the procedure.
    Furthermore, for most patients with stable angina, a stent may be no better than medication at managing symptoms such as pain and breathlessness. And it won’t help prevent a heart attack, as numerous large trials carried out over the past 20 years have proved.
    Despite this, ‘as many as 70 per cent of patients undergoing non-emergency PCIs erroneously believe that the procedure is to improve life expectancy and prevent a heart attack’, says Professor David Taggart, of the Nuffield Department of Surgery in Oxford, the author of guidelines on stents published in the Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery in 2013.
    He wrote: ‘Individual practitioners still follow personal preferences even though these are not evidence-based and may even be influenced by financial incentives.’
    But that’s not to say a PCI is always inappropriate for people with stable angina.
    ‘It certainly has a place in managing unpleasant symptoms, especially when they interfere with everyday life,’ says Dr Malhotra.
    ‘But it’s important that patients offered a PCI for stable angina understand that neither a stent nor an angioplasty has any impact whatsoever in preventing a future heart attack.
    ‘The problem is that many patients don’t know this.’
    REPLUMBING YOUR HEART 
    The other form of procedure performed for heart disease is coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). About 20,000 are carried out in England every year.
    The operation is performed under general anaesthetic and takes up to six hours. It’s offered when all three major coronary arteries show signs of disease or when severe angina isn’t helped by medicine alone.
    It involves taking sections of a vein from elsewhere — usually the chest, leg or arm — and attaching them to a coronary artery above and below narrowed areas or blockages, diverting blood around them.
    For some patients there’s a choice between angioplasty and a CABG, says David Jenkins, a consultant cardiothoracic surgeon at Papworth Hospital in Cambridge and chair of the clinical audit group of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery. CABG is associated with better long-term symptom relief and a return to a normal life expectancy.
    But the risks are slightly higher than for PCI, including bleeding, heart attack and stroke. Recovery time is 12 weeks compared with one or two for PCI. But with PCI, there’s a greater risk of symptoms recurring, and no rise in life expectancy.
    ‘We recommend that patients with coronary artery disease who do not fall clearly into one of the two types of intervention have their case discussed at a multi-disciplinary meeting that includes cardiologists who do PCI and surgeons who do CABG, and that any recommendations are discussed in detail with the patient,’ says Mr Jenkins.
    TREATING A FAULTY HEARTBEAT 

    USEFUL TIP TO REMEMBER 

    Some natural remedies such as ginseng can affect blood pressure so iF you have hypertension, let your GP know what herbal pills you’re taking.
    Heart disease is a major cause of heart rhythm problems (arrhythmias), such as atrial fibrillation, an irregular heartbeat. The heartbeat is determined by a small current that passes through the heart.
    A faulty heartbeat can trigger symptoms such as breathlessness, dizziness and fainting. If it disrupts normal life or is dangerous, it is treated with ablation, a procedure normally carried out by interventional cardiologists.
    A small wire — a catheter — is passed into a large vein in the leg and up into the chambers of the heart, where it is heated to create a scar to block the abnormal electrical circuits. The procedure sometimes needs to be repeated.
     
    Are statins worth the side-effects?
    Statins are the most commonly prescribed drugs in the developed world. And chances are, if you’re not already taking one, you’re being badgered by your GP to do so.
    There’s little doubt that people who have already had a heart attack or who have unstable angina (sudden and severe chest pains) are safer taking a statin, says Dr Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist at Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey. ‘We don’t know exactly why statins prevent further heart attacks. But we know they do,’ he says.
    But what if you’re not in this high risk group? New guidelines from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) state that you should take a statin if you have a 10 per cent risk of a heart attack in the next ten years.
    Up to 17.5 million people, four out of ten of the adult population including most men over 60 and women over 65, have this degree of risk, says NICE.
    But these new guidelines brought an unprecedented storm of protest from senior clinicians including the president of the Royal College of Physicians.
    Doctors accused NICE of ‘medicalising healthy individuals while withholding the true level of side-effects’. One survey showed six out of ten GPs wouldn’t want themselves or their families treated with statins if they had the 10 per cent/ten-year risk.
    You can find out your risk of heart attack with an online calculator (go to qrisk.org), which involves entering basic information such as your age, family history of heart disease as well as blood pressure and cholesterol levels. If you are at 10 per cent risk or higher, the next question is if you should go onto statins.
    When deciding to take medication you need to consider something called NNT, the Numbers Needed to Treat.

    USEFUL TIP TO REMEMBER 

    Impotence can be an early warning sign of heart disease, so men affected by this should see their GP for a check.
    The NNT for healthy people taking a statin is 104: that means to prevent just one heart attack, 104 people with your same risk will need to take a statin. For the other 103, the drug will make no difference.
    That is too low a benefit, say many doctors, who point to the potential side-effects. According to the evidence-based medicine website, thennt.com, statins carry a 10 per cent risk of debilitating muscle damage and 2 per cent risk of developing diabetes.
    And there may be other risks: there is concern that drug companies, which have carried out most of the research on statin safety, may have withheld data on side-effects.
    The protests against statins have infuriated those who back their widespread use, including Sir Rory Collins, head of the Clinical Trial Service Unit at Oxford University.
    He has said ‘lives will be lost as a result of health professionals misleading people over the safety of statins’ (though he’s since admitted his own findings were based on incomplete data).
    The answer ultimately is about pitting the (unguaranteed) promise of future health against worries about side-effects.
    ‘When we offer statins, we’re less like doctors and more like a life insurance sales team offering occasional benefits, many years from now, in exchange for small ongoing costs,’ says Dr Ben Goldacre, an epidemiologist and medical writer. ‘People differ in what they want to pay now, in side-effects or inconvenience.’
     
    Don't be afraid of sex
    Exercise after a diagnosis of heart disease or a heart attack is vitally important.
    A recent study by the American Heart Association showed that heart attack patients who undertook exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation were 20 to 25 per cent less likely to die prematurely.
    Exercise strengthens the heart and keeps arteries and other blood vessels flexible.
    After recovering from a heart attack or bypass, ask your GP what level of exercise is appropriate for you, says Jim Pate, a physiologist at the Centre for Human Health and Performance Exercise in London. Thereafter, the amount of exercise you tackle depends on what you did previously, says Dr Mike Knapton, GP and associate medical director of the British Heart Foundation (BHF).
    ‘We advise people to follow NHS guidelines of 30 minutes of moderate exercise each day, but for more specialised advice get yourself referred to a cardiac rehabilitation service.’
    Moderate exercise means getting out of breath — such as brisk walking, swimming or cycling. Mr Pate recommends using a heart rate monitor and getting a personal trainer or physiotherapist to assess a safe range for exercise. A sensible approach would be not to exceed more than 90 per cent of your maximum heart rate, he says.
    ‘This means don’t push yourself to the point that you can’t talk or respond to any questions.’
    Watch for signs that you’re over-doing it — exhaustion, breathlessness, increased pulse — but don’t be afraid of pushing yourself a bit.
    ‘Physical inactivity is, on the whole, worse than physical activity,’ says Dr Knapton. ‘We have this ingrained belief that doing too much is bad for you, but that’s not the case.’
    Another form of physical activity affected by heart disease is sex. A poll conducted by the BHF last year found that 32 per cent of people with heart conditions had sex less often and 19 per cent had stopped — from fear of a heart attack, because they’d lost interest or felt unattractive because of scarring from heart surgery.
    Patients can have sex again if they can walk a mile in 20 minutes or two flights of stairs in 20 seconds, says Graham Jackson, honorary consultant cardiologist at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals and chairman of the Sexual Advice Association.
    Sex might bring on angina symptoms because your heart is working harder, says June Davison, a specialist nurse at the BHF: ‘If you have a chest wound, be careful not to put it under pressure.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3046298/HOW-BEAT-HEART-DISEASE-isn-t-fat-clogs-arteries-true-villain-surprise-you.html#ixzz3Xsah3ALy 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook